| So now I've seen The Passion of the Christ, and my reaction might surprise you.
During the weeks leading up to the film, anticipation in the midst of all the controversy increased exponentially for me. I watched interviews with Mel Gibson, saw all the crap that people were slinging at him, and I got to the point where I began to believe that this was the film to see. The one movie that I needed to take in. Yeah, I might've believed this truly was The Greatest Story Ever Told. I was wrong. Okay, before you start to criticize me, hear me out. Or...well, read me out. I didn't hate the movie. I didn't love it either. It's not The Greatest Story Ever Told. It's more like The Greatest Two Hour Torture Scene Ever Put on Film. For any of you who know me, know of my deep faith and love for Jesus Christ. My acknowledgement of His sacrifice has been unshakeable. I'm thankful eternally for it, and will never, ever deny the purpose behind the crucifixion. But for me, as a film critic, I have to set my faith aside and look at this film from a film critic's point of view. Well, not so much set my faith aside, but look at this through eyes of faith with a film critics mind. It's a good movie, don't get me wrong. Is it a great movie? No. It's very artsy, very well crafted - there is no doubt in my mind that Mel Gibson is a talented and creative filmmaker. But this movie is not phenomenal. It's not stunning. It's not anything but a prolonged vision of brutality. I don't doubt the realism of the approach, I don't doubt that the film itself will prove a powerful tool to bring people to the question of why Christ would do that and why God would allow it. But I just can't bring myself to say this is one of the greatest movies I've ever seen. Some of it is done quite well. I think the depiction of Satan as a frighteningly beautiful woman was the best depiction of pure evil that I've ever seen. The performances were good all around, and the style of the film is wonderful. But it left me feeling...unfulfilled. Part of it might have been my devouring of information for weeks leading up to the film. I knew more about it than I wanted. But my biggest problem is the minimal exposition of the Resurrection in the end. It's there, but there's not enough of it. Maybe I'm in a minority here, but as much as Christ's Death on the cross was and is important, I believe that it's the Resurrection that serves an even larger purpose. Without sufficient coverage of that in the film, it feels like the first two hours, nine minutes and thirty seconds of the film were for naught. I guess it just seemed out of balance. Bottom Line - Go see the film, but don't blame me if it makes you feel upset in the stomach. And no, I didn't cry my eyes out entirely. Grade: *** out of ***** (3/5) |
Friends
Entertainment Blogs That Rule
Comic Book Blogs that Rule
Comics that Rule
Music
Miscellany
About Me
I'm a self important blogger. What else is there to say?
Previous Posts
- An Open Letter to William Wang, CEO of Vizio TV
- Professionalism, at it's BEST!
- The 2996 Project - Remembering Carol M. Bouchard
- One Down, A Few More to Go...
- Becoming Resourceful
- Updating my Web Site
- Feeling Accomplished.
- John Hughes - Bigger than Spielberg?
- Father/Son Bonding
- New Video: Brothers at Play
Archives
- November 2002
- January 2003
- February 2003
- August 2003
- September 2003
- October 2003
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- January 2010
| A long awaited update....
Took a while. Twelve days is probably the longest sabbatical I've taken from here in a long time. I guess the biggest problem is that I'm hard up for material, or really not looking for much. Or I've been so busy that I haven't really been able to think enough funny thoughts. Either way, if you're a loyal reader, I'm sorry. I was given a gift certificate for Christmas for one free CD from the BMG Music Group. I'm a music guy, so this is the perfect gift for a guy like me. But, I'm a music snob, so it makes for a hard decision. What is a music snob, you ask? Simply put, it's a person who appreciates generally original music with poignant lyrics and a talented approach to composition. Sure, I've had my share of Vanilla Ice moments (don't laugh -- you know you bobbed your head to "Ice, Ice, Baby" at least once), but in recent years, I've gotten, well, picky. Music has to fit a criteria for me. It has to be like something I've never heard before. While there are exceptions (Jacob's Trouble does sound a lot like U2, but that doesn't make them rock any less in my mind...)I generally look for good songwriters more than people who are radio friendly. So my love for Daniel Amos, The 77's and The Danielson Famile leaves me wanting when I have to look for a CD in a catalogue full of bands that I wouldn't be caught dead listening too. (well, with one exception being the afforementioned Vanilla Ice, but I won't talk about that right now...) Finally, after searching for what seemed like hours (okay, it was probably 45 minutes), I settled for The Joshua Tree by U2. It's a classic, a surefire hit for me, and I won't be dissappointed. But whatever happened to good music? Did video really kill the radio star? Did MTV kill it all softly with it's song? Maybe. And that's sad. |


